Weekly Horoscope for
President Bill Clinton's Weekly Horoscope Forecast
by Michael Star ©2009
Weekly Horoscope | Clinton Questions | Reader Feedback
In the earliest days of Astrology, it was practised only by the most learned men of a nation who were the advisors to the head of state. The personal horoscope of the ruler of the nation was interpreted in the context of it being an indicator of the affairs of the entire nation, not just of the individual man or woman.
Since most rulers of nations today do not have the absolute dictatorial power of the kings of ancient times, this way of forecasting the fortunes of a nation is not as useful, nor is used by modern astrologers as a primary indicator. However, to the extent that the leader's personal choices influence the decisions which govern the nation, his or her personal horoscope will remain an indicator of what motivates those choices and thus affects the nation as a whole. An obvious example of the relevance of the leader's personal choices was the Clinton-Lewinsky s e x scandal which absorbed the attention of the entire nation and its government for much of a year.
So when you read President Bill Clinton's personal weekly horoscope forecast, you might find it interesting and perhaps enlightening to assess for yourself how well it relates to the choices he is making which affect the affairs of the United States and its role in world affairs. I can tell you that when I write the Daily Horoscope for Leo every day, I always wonder how well it will describe attitudes and actions and events in the life of Bill Clinton, since his personal birth horoscope just happens to be very close to the general one used in creating the Daily Horoscopes for the Sign of Leo. You might find it entertaining to see how often something you see in the news might have been forecast in the daily or weekly horoscopes for this Leo leader of the world's super-power nation!
It has been said that "Character is Destiny", and I will give you one example of how Bill Clinton's character as revealed in his personal birth horoscope is affecting the world's destiny. Though it has Sun in Leo (the Sign of a leader), it also has Mars in Libra (the Sign of a lover, not a fighter), which means his first choice of strategies for action in dealing with conflict will be the strategies of the Sign of Libra - cooperation, compromise, diplomacy, fairness. What role has Clinton taken in world affairs? A peace-maker, just like a typical Libra. What role has the United States taken in world affairs? The World's Policeman, another form of peace-keeper and peace-maker. Can you see now why Bill Clinton is so reluctant to commit to war, and why even when his country's armed forces are bombing a country like Iraq or Serbia, he calls it a "peace-keeping" mission instead of a "war"?
Get a copy of Bill Clinton's new autobiography by clicking here to go to eBooks.com Bestsellers (opens a new window).
The weekly horoscope forecast reproduced here is the same one offered to Michael Star's clients through STAR SIGNS Astrology Zine, and no changes have been made to make it appear more appropriate to Bill Clinton's current affairs. Any person with the same month/day/year/time and town of birth as President Clinton would receive the same horoscope reading. Some of the same experiences will be faced by many people, but they may manifest in different forms or occur at different times in their lives.
Bill Clinton's birth date was August 19, 1946, and his place of birth was Hope, Arkansas. The reported birth time used here is 3:44 AM Central Standard Time. Because his birth horoscope has the Sun in Leo, and his Ascendant is at 1 degree of Leo (and thus his Rising Sign is Leo), the general Free Weekly Horoscope and Free Daily Horoscope for the Sign of Leo (which assumes the Ascendant is at 0 degrees of Leo) will be very close to this personal horoscope forecast, which is based on President Clinton's exact time and place of birth.
However, since the House Cusps are slightly different in his true birth chart than in the Solar Chart used for the Sun-Sign horoscopes, you will see some differences at times. This is why it is best to get a personal horoscope reading based on your own exact birth data, not just your general Sun Sign. If your Ascendant is in a different Sign than your Sun (which is true for about 11 out of every 12 humans), you will find the personal horoscope reading more accurate than the generalized free forecasts for your Sun Sign. By comparing this personal forecast for Bill Clinton to the general Leo forecast, you can see how some Planets will be in different Houses, and the dates of influence will be slightly different.
If your Sun Sign and Ascendant Sign are quite different, you will see a greater difference between your personal horoscope reading and any Sun-Sign horoscope you read on the Web or in a newspaper. The general forecast will be true to some extent, but the most accurate horoscope is the one created using your exact birth data: month/day/year/time and town. If you know your Ascendant Sign (Rising Sign) try reading the daily and weekly horoscopes for both, and see which gives you a more accurate forecast.
See some interesting feedback from an American reader
Monica Lewinsky Karma Horoscope
Clinton-Lewinsky Compatibility Horoscope
This horoscope is for illustration purposes only, and was not requested nor approved by Past President Clinton.
********************************* YOUR WEEKLY F O R E C A S T ********************************* Bill Clinton 25AUG2008 (c)2008 by MICHAEL STAR 'For Amusement' Valid TODAY 25AUG2008 MON 81 Lakeshore E. #51 Mississauga ON Canada L5G4S7 #F00000080825001 As the Sun and Planets appear to travel through the 12 sectors of the sky called the "Houses" they INDICATE (do NOT create) certain emotions & experiences or events that could be manifesting in the lives of certain people in whose Houses the Sun & Planets appear during the time covered by the forecast. (The House boundaries are based on the TIME of birth). This "forecast" lists several of the MOST LIKELY EFFECTS as each Planet travels the House it's in ON the forecast date; which last until it reaches the next House. While Sun is in House 2 18 more days 16AUG08 to 12SEP08 It's a time to re-evaluate your priorities and personal values. It's time to see if your possessions could be possessing YOU. It's time to decide which material things are really important. You use your material resources to define or express yourself. You may want to use the things you own to bring joy to others. You show off some possessions that give you personal pleasure. You use money or material things to get control of your own life. You face situations that require you to stand up for your values. Strongest effect: 29AUG08 30AUG08 19AUG08 18AUG08 While Mercury is in House 3 24 more days 23AUG08 to 18SEP08 Your mind is quicker & sharper; you speak or write more clearly. It's a good time for mental work requiring logic or concentration. You want to talk...and have many calls/chats/discussions/debates. You move around more; meet many new people; and may go on a trip. Life seems to be moving faster; and you feel mentally restless. It's good to gather information now; but not make decisions yet. It's time to talk possibilities but not make final conclusions. You need to stay flexible and be open to new ideas or experiences. Strongest effect: 26AUG08 27AUG08 02SEP08 03SEP08 While Venus is in House 3 22 more days 23AUG08 to 16SEP08 You perceive a pleasant & agreeable air in your environment. Your everyday activities and social contacts flow more smoothly. Your chats & calls & letters are warmer & friendlier...or of Love. You are more sensitive to beauty so you see more of it around you. You are more perceptive of Love and feel it more in daily life. You feel & appreciate affection more so you TELL people you care. You want life to be light and lovely; not so serious or sombre. You feel more like socializing & talking and just having some fun. Strongest effect: 27AUG08 28AUG08 04SEP08 05SEP08 While Mars is in House 3 26 more days 03AUG08 to 20SEP08 In your everyday life the pace picks up & things are energized. You get passionate in expounding & defending your beliefs & ideas. You're willing to argue or fight for your beliefs/ideas/opinions. You feel a need to be right; and get into unnecessary arguments. You identify your ego with your opinions & overreact to critics. You may act more aggressive or defiant in your speech & writing. You can be more forceful in presenting or selling your ideas. You can work long & hard at any mental activity without fatigue. Strongest effect: 29AUG08 30AUG08 13AUG08 12AUG08 Bill Clinton 19AUG1946 03:44 AM ST Zn 6 Hope AR (c)2008 STAR SIGNS Astrology Zine http://www.AstrologyZine.com
Questions a curious Canadian asked himself (in 1998) when trying to understand the Clinton-Lewinsky phenomenon:
- Bill Clinton is the elected President of the United States, and is a charismatic and effective world leader respected by many other world leaders. Why is the American government conducting a smear campaign on its own leader?
- If I had an employer who asked me point-blank if I were having an extra-marital affair at work, and I was, would I tell the truth?
- Would I try to "cover up" the secret affair to protect myself and my partner from very negative effects on my home and work life? Would I believe I was protecting my family from shame, and my marriage from breaking up, and that defending my family would justify any means that would help keep this information secret?
- Would I resent this intrusion into my private life? Would I feel that no one has the right to even ask such questions about my s e x life, and that they do not deserve an answer? If pressed on this question, would I believe that an evasive answer or flat denial is justified, and not the same as lying about some other issue?
- If forced under threat of dismissal to submit to several hours of intense questioning which required me to give graphic descriptions of my most intimate moments, would I eventually get irritated or angry at the person subjecting me to what I might consider an invasion of my right to privacy about my s e x life? Would I feel that I was being unfairly persecuted?
- If every political leader were held to the same standards of personal conduct as President Clinton, and subjected to such extensive and expensive investigations as he was, how many would be found guilty of "inappropriate behaviour" and removed from office for trying to keep it secret?
- Do I care if my own elected officals have extra-marital affairs, as long as they perform well at the job they were elected to do?
- Why doesn't "the Fifth Amendment" apply to the President? Is he expected to answer questions which might "incriminate" himself? Have the people who are angry at him for "lying about it" ever been forced to answer the question "Did you cheat on your spouse?" in a public forum? Would they lie if forced to answer that particular question, even though they would not lie under oath about anything else?
- Did the American public already believe Bill Clinton was having extra-marital affairs, yet elected him anyway? Did the majority, by voting for a known philanderer, tacitly agree that this was not important to them as long as the man had many fine qualities which would make him a good choice as leader of the state government, and then leader of the country? Why would they suddenly change their priorities when the Lewinsky affair was investigated?
- Is it about having an affair, or having it "in the workplace"?
- Would a sexual affair with an unmarried consenting adult be more easily accepted if he had taken the extra time off to go to a motel instead?
- Why are some Americans outraged that the President is having a private affair while being paid by their taxes, even though the President of the U.S.A. gets paid less and works longer than many corporation presidents and sports players - and has to live where he works so his private time can be intruded upon when public duty calls?
- Are some of the people throwing stones living in glass houses? Are the people who want to punish him for "lying" guiltless in ever having lied themselves?
- Are the Christians who condemn Clinton for his sexual "immorality" aware of Christ's advice: "Judge not, lest ye be judged?" [I later saw it reported on the news September 27th that the Minister of Bill Clinton's church did bring this point to the attention of the congregation.]
- Did this prophecy come true when the leader of the House Judiciary Committee discovered an old extra-marital affair of his own being exposed on the Internet? (While he was an elected official, and with a married woman, and which broke up a marriage.)
- Why is the man who heads the House Judiciary Committee which investigates the Clinton "s e x scandal" a man who once committed adultery himself while holding a public office (Henry Hyde)? Is this an example of how the American public can "forgive and forget" a sexual indiscretion and honour a former "bad boy" with a position of such importance in governing the United States? Why is Henry Hyde's credibility unquestioned, while Bill Clinton's is said by some to no longer have the trust of the people? Does this imply, by the appointment of this former adulterer to be Head of the House Judiciary Committee, that the sexual indiscretions of President Bill Clinton are not really of concern to Congress? Does this imply that there is something else that they wish to condemn Clinton for?
- Did Henry Hyde ever lie to "cover up" his own extra-marital affair? Can Hyde be an impartial "judge" or "juror" in the Clinton case when he has been guilty of the same act which led Kenneth Starr to investigate Bill Clinton? Why is this not being questioned by Congress, or the American public? No disrespect to Mr. Hyde, who appears to be an honourable man, but does he not have a "conflict of interest" situation here which might require him to resign as the head of a committee which is investigating the sexual misconduct of an elected official? Why is he allowed to judge someone else for adultery, when he has done the same thing himself and not been forced out of office as a result?
- Why did some U.S. Congressmen complain angrily about possibly getting treated the way they treated President Clinton? Why is it okay for them to expose the intimate details of Clinton's sexual affair to the whole world, but not okay for some third party to expose the details of their own past sexual affairs to the news media? Why were they angry at the Clinton administration when Henry Hyde's affair was exposed on the Internet, when it was actually a resentful ex-husband who revealed the story of his wife's affair with the leader of the Judiciary Committee?
- If those who complain so vigorously about being scrutinized believe they have nothing to hide, why are they so concerned about it? Are they afraid their own guilty secrets will be exposed?
- If there is harm being done to "the Presidency", is it the result of Clinton's secret affair, or is it really the result of the obsessive efforts of Kenneth Starr to discover it and reveal it to the world?
- Did Clinton and Lewinsky "get caught", or did they get betrayed by a confidante of Monica Lewinsky? If no one had found out, would any harm have been done to America or to the world?
- Is a man named Bill Clinton expected to have more control over his sexual or romantic urges than the populace that elected him to do the business of the nation? If so, why?
- Strictly speaking, can there be "sexual relations" when there is no sexual intercourse and no possibility of sexual reproduction? It's a fine point, but the phrase does appear ambiguous and could be interpreted two ways. If oral s e x is defined as "sexual relations", what word defines sexual intercourse? If pressed to answer such a question, what would I answer under the same circumstances?
- Am I forgetting to look for the Love in what I see here, or am I only paying attention to the s e x ? Did Monica love Bill? Did Bill love Monica? Is my capacity, or anyone's, to give Love limited to one person?
- Is pornographic material harmless to children if Congress publishes it on the Net, but harmful if anyone else does? Why was it deemed necessary to publish the details of Bill and Monica's private sexual behaviour, when they had already admitted to having a sexual relationship? Does the American government hold to a double standard regarding the publishing of pornography?
- Does a court of law continue investigating a case when the accused has already confessed and pleaded guilty?
- Does the public have the right to know the explicit details of a sexual affair, or just that there was a sexual affair which has already been admitted publicly?
- Does a court of law purposely punish an accused by taking action to humiliate him in public, even before the verdict has been decided and the sentence passed?
- What has happened to that basic assumption in American Justice that presumes the accused is innocent until proven guilty?
- Bill Clinton is the leader of the nation, duly elected twice by a majority of American voters, and an effective world leader respected by many other world leaders. Why is there so little respect being given to the highest official in the nation by certain members of the House of Representatives, the Senate, the Independent Council, the Grand Jury, and the press? Why is Bill Clinton's public approval rating in the polls so high, and yet the same public treats him with derision and allows him to be subjected to public humiliation which a private individual would be protected from by the threat of a slander suit?
- In Canada, an accused sadistic murderer like Paul Bernardo was given more respect for his rights (and more protection from public pre-judgment) by the judicial system until proven guilty, than President Clinton appears to be getting from the American judicial system. The President had s e x with an unmarried consenting adult woman who worked for him. Why is he being persecuted for an act which is not criminalized under the nation's laws, and why is so much time and effort and money being spent on revealing the details of something so minor? Why the endless obsession with the salacious details of the President's s e x life? We can see the American public (and the public in other nations like Canada too) is interested in seeing s e x in their soap operas and television shows and movies, but why is Congress catering to this obsession with s e x by ordering the broadcast of material that might ordinarily be censored on public television? Is there some hypocrisy here?
- What pursuit of "Justice" is being served when the Paula Jones civil case which required the investigation of Clinton's sexual history and his testimony under oath was ultimately dismissed by a Judge as having no merit? While it may eventually be proven he "perjured" himself in that case, how relevant is it when the Jones case itself was dismissed even when the truth was told, and the case was originally about personal sexual conduct and not about Clinton's behaviour in conducting the nation's business?
- If an illegal means is used to obtain evidence in a criminal case, does the American justice system not consider that evidence inadmissable in court? Why is Linda Tripp's illegal tape-recording of Monica Lewinsky and her intentional entrapment not being disregarded, instead of being aired on public television at the request of Congress?
- The "trial" has not even begun, so why is all the "evidence" being released to the public in great detail? What fair and impartial judge in a criminal case would order the public release of evidence before the trial began? Why was confidential evidence presented to the Grand Jury leaked to the media? Who is responsible for breaking the law in this regard? Why does the House Judicial Committee have the right to release evidence before the trial has even begun? If Congressmen and Senators are like the "jurors" in a criminal case, why are they allowed to discuss matters concerning the case in public before the verdict is reached? What kind of "kangaroo court" might this appear to be in the eyes of the world?
- What harm is being done here to the respect for the American system of Justice? If so, who is doing the harm, and why?
- How can an accused citizen be fairly judged, when the "law" he is alleged to have broken has not even been established before he is brought to trial for having broken it? Why doesn't Congress define what constitutes "high crimes and misdemeanors" before they go looking for what Clinton might have done to be considered guilty of this undefined "law"? Will the way the impeachment process is proceeding give the public (and the world) the impression that the House Judiciary Committee is not pursuing "justice" at all? Does this give the appearance of a "guilty" verdict in search of a crime? Is the Congress itself "obstructing justice" - which is the same thing they are accusing the President of doing?
- If I felt that I was being unfairly treated by a judicial investigation, even to the point of feeling the investigation was motivated not by the pursuit of Justice but to serve an opponent's political agenda, would I resist participating in my own persecution?
- If Bill Clinton was "the defendant" in the Paula Jones civil case, why was he expected to admit his own guilt? What is the point of a trial, if the defendant is not allowed to declare that he is not guilty?
- Why is Clinton's response to a question about his consensual sexual relationship, which was not really "material" to the Paula Jones "sexual harrassment" case, considered "perjury"? If the facts are not material to the case, how can misrepresenting them be considered "perjury"? How can Clinton's testimony be considered "material" to a case which the judge ruled was without merit, and which was dismissed? Why does the Independent Counsel, a court judge himself, consider Clinton's response to his Grand Jury questions about s e x with Monica as "perjury"?
- Is anyone aware of the private agreements between Bill and Hillary Clinton regarding their marriage vows? If Clinton's life partner can accept his secret affairs, why do others find it so unacceptable?
- For Americans, and for all of us in the world who are witness to the events of the Clinton investigation, is this more about ourselves and our personal beliefs than about what Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky chose to do or not do in their personal lives? Should we ask ourselves: "What do I see in them that I also see in myself?"
- From this experience, is America learning a lot about themselves, and about how they and their leaders interpret and implement the ideals envisioned in their excellent constitution's political and justice systems?
- Is this perhaps a good and necessary thing, one that may lead to some evaluations and re-evaluations of what is most important to Americans?
- Will America demonstrate to the world the best balance of Justice and Mercy - that balance between Truth and Consequences which is the basis of the best justice systems man has devised?
Get PERSONAL Horoscopes by email
| The Solar Horoscope | 1998 "Horrorscope" | Free Daily Horoscopes | Free Weekly Horoscopes | Free Yearly Forecasts | Monthly Forecast | Career Counselor | Karmic Gifts | Compatibility | What's New | What-They-Say | Quick Site Index | HOME
Clinton-Lewinsky Compatibility Horoscope
Link-to: Clinton-Lewinsky Mating Rating | Date Games | Star-Mates | Read-You | Teach-You | FAQ: Tarot-Astrology-Numerology | Free Weekly Horoscopes | GEMs | ABOUT-Michael | CONTACT Michael | 2-ORDER | HOME |
Link-to: Quick Site Index | New Astrology Articles | Astrology Gifts | Romance Readings | Compatibility Horoscope | Cupid: True Love | Live Events | Lectures | Michael's BIO | Michael's ADDRESS | Page-TOP | ORDER-FORM
Last Update December 29 2008 01:00 EST.
Author and Address©1998-2009 Michael Star
81 Lakeshore East #51, Mississauga ON, Canada L5G 4S7
This entire page is copyrighted ©1998-2009 by Michael Star. Permission is freely granted to retrieve and store this material for personal use only, but no part may be reproduced, distributed, published, or sold in any media without the permission of the author. All rights reserved.
Hyperlinks to this page are invited, provided they are to the TOP of the page only.
Email Michael at: firstname.lastname@example.org
Internet Web Site: STAR SIGNS Astrology Zine http://www.AstrologyZine.com
This horoscope is for illustration purposes, and was not requested nor approved by Past President Bill Clinton. For entertainment purposes only.
STAR SIGNS Astrology Zine by Michael Star
e-Zine of the Arcane Arts:
Astrology * Tarot * Numerology * Crystals * Graphology
Free Daily & Weekly & Yearly Horoscopes * Psychic Stars Daily Oracle
Personal Horoscope Readings and Birth Charts
HOME page: http://www.AstrologyZine.com